On the Prusty paper thread @cassava7 quoted a section of the paper where they looked at LPS stimulation.

Prusty paper thread said:
One of the most prominent candidate molecules that can provide strong antiviral defense is IFN. Hence, we tested IFN response in A549 cells upon treatment with ME/CFS or HC serum. We observed a strong decrease in mRNA levels of IFN-β, IFIT-1, and ICAM-1 within the A549 cells in presence of ME/CFS serum in comparison with HC serum (Fig. 5D–F). Then we asked whether the secretory IFN response in isolated PBMCs is higher in ME/CFS patients. For this we used a different cohort of 22 CFS patients and 22 HC. Upon challenge with LPS, we found lower levels of secreted TNF-α (p < 0.01) and IFN-γ (p < 0.05) from CFS patient PBMCs compared with HC (Supplemental Fig. 2B). No significant differences were seen for IL-1 and IL-5. These results ruled out a potential role of IFN response in the mitochondrial fragmentation and antiviral response in ME/CFS patients.
 
More info on the Tru-culture test used in this paper in the video of a post on the Prusty paper thread. LINK (Ian Lipkin 2019 presentation to the CDC)
 
Last edited:
This paper explains the method and how the Tru-culture system compares to conventional PBMC methods
Standardized whole blood stimulation improves immunomonitoring of induced immune responses in multi-center study.
Whole blood and PBMCs from healthy donors were exposed to LPS, anti-CD3 anti-CD28 antibodies, or media alone. 55 protein analytes were analyzed centrally by Luminex multi-analyte profiling in a CLIA-certified laboratory. TruCulture responses showed greater reproducibility and improved the statistical power for monitoring differential immune response activation. The use of TruCulture addresses a major unmet need through a robust and flexible method for immunomonitoring that can be reproducibly applied in multi-center clinical studies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron
Back
Top Bottom