Michael Sharpe skewered by @JohntheJack on Twitter

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS news' started by Indigophoton, Apr 9, 2018.

  1. Cheshire

    Cheshire Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,675
    It reminds me of Trudie Chalder totaly contradicting herself on 2 points in a Guardian article:

    https://www.theguardian.com/society...ients-fear-exercise-hinder-treatment-study-me

    So
    - a phobia in which you have to prevent patients from doing the dreaded thing.
    - this phobia is both irrational and reasonable.

    This is the point that makes me really angry. Their theories are so illogical and intelectually indigent. It is just so easy to see it, but it seems not a lot of people have been worried by this, this crap is the only thing we deserve for a lot of people.
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2018
    MEMarge, Woolie, Hutan and 17 others like this.
  2. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    I wish that I knew exactly what were the qualifications of Wessely, David, Butler and Chalder in 1989. It has always seemed to me that they were all much too junior and with too little experience to have such an influence. There views at the time seemed at variance with reality, and I think that is largely what led to the prejudice that they must have been seeing an entirely different patient population. It may just have been that they did not speak much to colleagues.

    Reviewer 2 gave the game away about the modus operandi.
     
    MEMarge, Binkie4, Woolie and 8 others like this.
  3. TiredSam

    TiredSam Committee Member

    Messages:
    10,505
    Location:
    Germany
    Seems perfectly consistent and logical to me. What she's saying is that ME sufferers should always listen to experts but never be allowed to listen to themselves.
     
    MEMarge, Woolie, Indigophoton and 8 others like this.
  4. Alvin

    Alvin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,309
    Dr Davis and Dr Klimas are experts, should we listen to them? :)
     
  5. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    53,406
    Location:
    UK
    I have wondered that too. I do remember reading somewhere that Simon Wessely was a trainee psychiatrist and was given the fatigued patients at the clinic because none of the other psychs wanted to deal with them, so he decided that would be his specialism.

    Given that they were being referred to a psych clinic it seems likely that at least some of them were suffering from depression, not ME, and were misdiagnosed because their presenting symptoms were expressed as physical - tiredness, lethargy, aching etc are common symptoms of depression, so for a trainee I can see that was an easy mistake to make. To build a career on such a misapprehension based on a small sample including some misdiagnosed patients and stick to that for 30 years is, in my opinion, unforgivable.

    Chalder was a mental health nurse who switched to psychological therapist. So she had little or no background in biomedical medicine - I suspect she simply went along with Wessely's theories and saw it as a good career path.
     
    MEMarge, Woolie, ukxmrv and 10 others like this.
  6. TiredSam

    TiredSam Committee Member

    Messages:
    10,505
    Location:
    Germany
    Have they co-authored a paper with Chalder?
     
    Cheshire likes this.
  7. Alvin

    Alvin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,309
    You can ask MS that one, if he says yes i will donate an extra $10 to David Tuller next year :D
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2018
    Inara, Trish and TiredSam like this.
  8. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,386
    The ability to blag their way into areas of science and society they have no right nor competence to be.
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2018
    MEMarge, Woolie, Daisymay and 6 others like this.
  9. Luther Blissett

    Luther Blissett Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,678
    Excellent spot. Here's a little word substitution to make it quite clear what she is saying:

    Now, where are the objective studies measuring this fear of exercise that we supposedly have? Where are the studies measuring the fight or flight response in patients? Where are the comparison studies with other debilitating psychological fear based conditions?

    This is why I feel it important to point out their exercise avoidance phobia theory. Even a GP in the office would be able to measure at least some of the fight or flight response by taking pulse readings and observing things like sweating, respiration rate, pupil dilation etc. You don't even have to have the object of the patients' fear in the office, just a picture or short video, to measure this.

    Here's a list of things to measure:

    • Acceleration of heart and lung action
    • Paling or flushing, or alternating between both
    • Inhibition of stomach and upper-intestinal action to the point where digestion slows down or stops
    • General effect on the sphincters of the body
    • Constriction of blood vessels in many parts of the body
    • Liberation of metabolic energy sources (particularly fat and glycogen) for muscular action
    • Dilation of blood vessels for muscles
    • Inhibition of the lacrimal gland (responsible for tear production) and salivation
    • Dilation of pupil (mydriasis)
    • Relaxation of bladder
    • Inhibition of erection
    • Auditory exclusion (loss of hearing)
    • Tunnel vision (loss of peripheral vision)
    • Disinhibition of spinal reflexes
    • Shaking.
    That's a lot of things that can be objectively measured during a test.
     
    MEMarge, Woolie, Hutan and 9 others like this.
  10. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    This made me recall something in Sharpe's 1993 paper.

    "Inactivity produces a range of physical and mental changes similar to those suffered by people with CFS. These include muscle wasting, changes in the cardiovascular response to exertion, depressed mood, postural hypotension and impaired thermoregulation (Sharpe and Bass 1992). THESE EFFECTS CAN BE REVERSED WITH GRADUAL INCREASES IN ACTIVITY, ALTHOUGH THIS WILL COMMONLY RESULT IN A TRANSIENT AND PHYSIOLOGICALLY UNDERSTANDABLE, EXACERBATION OF SYMPTOMS, PARTICULARLY MUSCLE PAIN (EWARDS 1986).

    The full ref for that paper is
    Edwards RHT 1986 Muscle fatigue and pain. Acta Med Scan Suppl 711:179-188

    It would therefore appear that Edwards is implicated in the formulation of these ideas.
     
  11. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,511
    Location:
    UK

    Just to point out that this is an Edwards who worked at Liverpool hospital and seems to only have published 2 papers. Not Jonathan Edwards.
     
    MEMarge, Woolie, Hutan and 4 others like this.
  12. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    Sharpe seems to have relied on

    Sensky T 1990 Patients reactions to illness. Br Med J 300:622-623
    but I rather doubt that it will provide the answers you seek.
     
  13. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    He published a great deal more than that. A 1993 paper of his which I am looking at lists 8 more, not including the one above.

    Sorry for any confusion about the names. I was assuming that we all knew who we were talking about.
     
  14. Lidia

    Lidia Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    155
    And experts will listen to ME sufferers when they say CBT works, but not when they say it doesn’t.
     
    MEMarge, Woolie, MarcNotMark and 10 others like this.
  15. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,386
    The bit these wallies seem to overlook is that the above only applies if the physical capabilities to exercise exist! It's akin to applying false-illness-belief psychotherapy to someone in a coma!
     
  16. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,200
    :wtf: Post Death Psychosis - The false belief syndrome in which people die and then think they can not engage in real life. If they could be made to exercise then they would show increased functional capacity. With CBT we can train them to overcome their false beliefs and fully engage in life. Its not helpful to speak of the undead or zombies because this is a false dichotomy, and BPZ theory clearly explains how this is not important. :confused:
     
    MEMarge, Woolie, Lidia and 11 others like this.
  17. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,974
    Location:
    London, UK
    Yes, I think Edwards was a major influence on the construction of the Wessely-Chalder speculation. Edwards was de facto head of Medicine at UCL around 1982-4 because the official head bowed out of any administrative function. He worked on muscle physiology in the context of training. I think he misapplied findings relating to vigorous training of healthy muscle to the situation in ME. In fact if you are deconditioned from an illness like EBV or major surgery all you need to do is gradually get back to normal activities - no need to deliberately exercise unless you want to do competitive sport. And it does not hurt or make you fell ill.
     
    MEMarge, Sly Saint, Woolie and 19 others like this.
  18. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,511
    Location:
    UK
    I'm clearly missing out on some history here.
     
    Barry and Luther Blissett like this.
  19. Indigophoton

    Indigophoton Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    849
    Location:
    UK
    Sean, Amw66, Barry and 5 others like this.
  20. Invisible Woman

    Invisible Woman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    10,280
    They've pulled this before - was it White who said they weren't studying ME?

    Maybe someone should now ask him what, in his opinion, the difference between ME and CFS is?
     
    MEMarge, Hutan, Lidia and 7 others like this.

Share This Page