Paul Garner on Long Covid and ME/CFS - BMJ articles and other media.

quite apart from the ME community, the Long Covid Community have excluded him from many of their online groups.

 

I think that is rather overestimating what she found. The levels of some rather obscure cytokines shifted a bit after about 3 years I think. Enough to be statistically significant maybe but nothing that we would normally take as relevant in clinical practice.

When those data came out I was impressed by the careful methodology and that something ad been found but I saw it as a tiny clue rather than anything to hang a theory on. Since then we have not heard more. I suspect that Hornig realised that there was no obvious way to build on the story.

 

I really think they’re best ignored, they can shout into the void because hardly anyone is buying it.

We are not “stopping people getting well” people are well able to hear about GET, LP, Brain-training App (I forget what it’s called) just as they are also able to read NICE guidance and NHS guidance, and make their own decisions. Free speech innit?

Why aren’t they lobbying the NHS to roll out their miracle cures, rather than attacking patients and patient groups for not believing they work?

 

Who's to say they're not doing both when there has been no method of officially reporting harm from psychosocial treatment similar to the yellow card scheme? That only changed in Oct 2023 when the HSSIB relaunched, but it has not been tested yet on this subject matter.

 

Biopsychosaurus works for me, as does “first, do no harm”

 

They very accurately embody the expression of people being so accustomed to privilege that they perceive equality and fairness as injustice. That they should have to provide evidence for their claims beyond their own opinions, when they have had the privilege of doing so for decades, is basically lèse-majesté as far as they're concerned.

As if they should have to do what everyone but them has to. They never had to before! Why should this start now?! Instead we see a move away from it, the only way they can keep on pretending that their clownish nonsense is anything but vapid delusions.

 

Paul Garner on Radio 5 live just after 10am this morning (29th October) introduced as a "covid expert" claiming it is a a "stress response" and the "nocebo effect"

Dr Amy Small was also interviewed and very politely disagreed and said it has multiple elements, including vascular.. commenting from memory so might not be accurate on the last part.

 

He clarified that cognitive approaches "can help"

This is a really good discussion. All sides getting an airing with lots of personal stories.

 

So silenced, much deplatformed.

 

I don’t fully get why as his only connection to the area is getting covid (April? 2020) that lasted until autumn 2020 - when he started being able to ‘exercise out of it/things lifted’ is a bit fuzzy but I’m guessing around 6months ish - he was on newsnight saying he was fine by the Jan? 8months later so guess he’d been ‘fine enough’ for a good time by then before you do that

anyway his only connection is having covid that lasted 6-8months in long covid symptoms until Jan 2021

which many people must have had, why he’s somehow seen by such programmes as any authority vs the next person. Who might have had it longer or shorter

am I right in thinking he retired so he didn’t get back to his job and that wasn’t in a specialism which would relate to biomedical covid or long covid or anything.

I know there is the publicising going on but I just don’t get it from any journalistic point of view it rather puzzles me. Just because some friends at uni recovered from glandular fever in this time frame I know it was pre-Twitter but you didn’t have this pick out someone in the middle who didn’t just have four weeks ill or was never the same again as if that’s some ‘special signal’

what am I missing?

 

He appears to be friends with Wessley and Gerada. The latter is the BBC's go to GP so it could be a connection to her or the Science Media Centre put him forward as their in house expert for all things covid?

 

but he isn't an expert? and that should reflect on them if that's the guise he is being put forward? He's a bloke that had covid for 6-8months like many others did. Telling his own story like any other patient also should have a right to (we tend not to and get these silly assertions thrown at what I think are quite straightforward descriptions) is one thing, it is one person who went about their life as anyone else can choose to do 'whatever' and its a bit unusual to get onto numerous shows or what not but still that's that.

But inferring 'expertise' in long covid or ME/CFS from a 6month personal experience that ended 3yrs ago as the sum total confuses me. When they ask for his credentials as an expert/who are you, as they might Binita Kane, Oonagh Cousins, Chris Ponting, Dr William Weir, Helen Baxter etc then his are 'patient/ill for 6-8months in 2020 with covid/long covid', not GP or scientist or any of the other bps's qualifications?

being friends with some of the bps doesn't make someone an expert and people who also had covid and long covid also had all sorts of jobs that also weren't being experts in areas related to ME/CFS or covid, I don't know his background but it isn't any more specific to ME/CFS than Miranda's is necessarily?

 

He is an epidemiologist who worked on infectious diseases at the Lpool School of Tropical Medicine, but he hasn’t “worked” on anything COVID. It’s all very muddy.
As he’s said he worked on Cochrane or helped set it up. It’s not just his “post-Covid condition” - daily 5km walks before the 6 month mark and international travel at the 7 month mark- timeline we need to look into, it’s how long and how far back the BPS connections go.

 

He's an expert in duplicity.
Read what he wrote here

Paul Garner on long haul covid-19—Don’t try to dominate this virus, accommodate it - The BMJ

and compare.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2UnoiHryx4

51mins

@Adam pwme 's recording of The Radio 5 live discussion on Long Covid from this morning & mentions ME. Starts with Paul Garner, but is a very good discussion Worth a listen

 

This wasn’t helping me. I don’t blame Cochrane—it is an edifice I have helped create—but these reviews represent for me a serious disconnect between mainstream medicine and my own experience, although I am no specialist in this area.

It really does seem that Dr Garner would benefit from some analysis on a couch to work through the cognitive dissonance he suffers from. Maybe to ask why he should not blame an edifice he help to create?