1. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 22nd February 2021 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Petition: Remove CBT/GET from NICE guidelines NOW (ALL COUNTRIES can sign)

Discussion in 'Petitions' started by Sly Saint, Feb 23, 2018.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member & Outreach

    Messages:
    12,123
    Likes Received:
    87,264
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Signed, now at 1597.
     
    Louie41, Hutan, MEMarge and 6 others like this.
  2. Seven

    Seven Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    675
    bump
     
    Louie41, MeSci and Invisible Woman like this.
  3. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    47,195
    Location:
    UK
    Unsurprisingly no mention from AfME

    eta: now at 1901
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2018
  4. Andy

    Andy Committee Member & Outreach

    Messages:
    12,123
    Likes Received:
    87,264
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
  5. Jenny TipsforME

    Jenny TipsforME Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    2,087
    Can we find any examples? What level of evidence has been required in the past for them to take this action?
     
    Louie41, adambeyoncelowe, Jan and 2 others like this.
  6. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,554
    Likes Received:
    43,543
    I think that when it comes to safety, in all walks of life, then Joe Public should not have to prove beyond doubt that something is harmful, before precautionary action is taken. Once reasonable concerns are raised, even in the form of convincing anecdotal evidence, the burden of proof should fall on the purveyors to prove an acceptable level of safety; it really should not fall on recipients to first prove harm.

    Edit: Are there legal precedents for this?
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2018
    Louie41, adambeyoncelowe, Jan and 3 others like this.
  7. Invisible Woman

    Invisible Woman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,447
    Likes Received:
    48,969
    Well, this is where the PACE trial has been quite well designed (sarcasm), hasn't it? They deliberately asked questions in such a way as to under report PEM and failed to adequately report harms.

    In addition, we have lots of anecdotal evidence such as the questionnaires by AfME and MEA and letters to Carol Monaghan, but it seems that the CFS clinics who push GET aren't feeding this back. There should be feedback from them to their local authorities showing the treatments aren't working or are even causing harm. Why aren't they flagging this up?

    As far as I know we have the patient surveys, other anecdotal evidence such as letters to MPs and works such as @Tom Kindlon 's report of under reporting of harms and other criticisms of PACE.

    I think I PMed you with some references I was given by a consultant in the past. Let me know if yoiu want 'em again.

    As far as I know, that's it.
     
    Louie41, adambeyoncelowe and MEMarge like this.
  8. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,562
    Likes Received:
    44,454
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    Over 2000 now
     
    Louie41, Barry, Jan and 5 others like this.
  9. MSEsperanza

    MSEsperanza Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,476
    Likes Received:
    10,620
    Location:
    betwixt and between
    Signed. #2389
     
    Louie41, Barry, MarcNotMark and 5 others like this.
  10. Jenny TipsforME

    Jenny TipsforME Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    2,087
    I think you misunderstood what I meant. I mean involving completely different conditions, not ME.

    When has NICE acted on these safeguarding caveats in the past? Then, if we find examples, how do these compare? It might be that they’ve never actually responded to safeguarding issues in this way or it might be that they withdraw treatments before a review quite frequently. Quite possibly it always involves drugs and placebo controlled trials showing the drug arm causes harm.
     
  11. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    47,195
    Location:
    UK
    2521 signed

    next target 5000
     
    Louie41, MEMarge, Nellie and 5 others like this.
  12. adambeyoncelowe

    adambeyoncelowe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,286
    Likes Received:
    16,521
    They have added warnings when drugs have been labelled unsafe, I think. I'll see if I can find any examples.
     
    Louie41, Joh, Jenny TipsforME and 2 others like this.
  13. Keela Too

    Keela Too Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    932
    Likes Received:
    8,246
    Location:
    Sally Burch - Northern Ireland
    Louie41, Esther12, Jan and 7 others like this.
  14. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    47,195
    Location:
    UK
    I haven't looked but the current revelations about use of vaginal mesh implants is one to watch and see what they do. The guidelines appear to have been done last year:

    https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg599/chapter/3-The-procedure

    The guidelines for this are not due to be reviewed until 2020 but given the number of incidences of people now suing the NHS they might have to take earlier action.
     
    Binkie4, Louie41, ukxmrv and 10 others like this.
  15. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,554
    Likes Received:
    43,543
    Not sure if this is relevant or not (drug interactions rather than contra-indications), but in case it is:

    https://bnf.nice.org.uk/interaction/doxycycline-2.html

    Note that quite a few of the entries simply cite evidence as being 'anecdotal', as per:

    upload_2018-2-27_17-5-39.png

    I've included it because it does seem to show NICE providing clear drug treatment safety advice, based on anecdotal evidence alone in some cases. Why should the same not apply to GET, which is still a physical treatment even if not a drug?

    Edit: Would this count as a valid precedent?
     
    Amw66, Sly Saint, John Mac and 12 others like this.
  16. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    47,195
    Location:
    UK
    if you do a search on 'nice guidelines exceptional review' it comes up with loads. (I haven't looked through them).
     
    Louie41, Jan, NelliePledge and 4 others like this.
  17. Jenny TipsforME

    Jenny TipsforME Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    2,087
    So if there’s a concern it triggers a review process? But we’re already in a review process so we can’t ask for that.
     
    Louie41, Barry and Keela Too like this.
  18. MEMarge

    MEMarge Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,845
    Likes Received:
    10,934
    Surely NICE could remind people that current Guidelines on CBT and GET are "optional", not mandatory, ie with the patient's (or family for youngsters) agreement and should ONLY be suggested for those at the milder end of the severity spectrum.

    They should NEVER be used as a threat of forced hospitalisation/intensive inpatient treatment/sectioning.

    If Prof Baker was as shocked as he said he was, by the distorted use of the current Guidelines then surely this is the absolute minimum that should be put on their website/sent to GPs/relevant Consultants/Royal Colleges/CFS Clinics etc and publicised by all ME charities and organisations that are patient-centred.
     
    Louie41, Skycloud, Andy and 8 others like this.
  19. Graham

    Graham Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,007
    Likes Received:
    26,776
    It sounds to me as if the original committee had a majority of people pushing for CBT/GET, but a vocal minority unable to support them. So they came up with a compromise of putting it down and making it subject to patients agreeing to it. Little did the minority realize that 120 lines on CBT and GET with an opt-out would be taken as a firm statement that ME was primarily psychological in nature, and that opting out would be seen as refusing treatment.
     
    Louie41, Sbag, Jan and 9 others like this.
  20. Binkie4

    Binkie4 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,436
    Likes Received:
    10,505
    My MP has written today that he has signed the petition.
     

Share This Page