Arvo
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Abstract:
Patients with COVID-19 may develop abnormal inflammatory response and lymphopenia, followed in some cases by delayed-onset syndromes, often long-lasting after the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection. As viral infections may activate human endogenous retroviral elements (HERV), we studied the effect of SARS-CoV-2 on HERV-W and HERV-K envelope (ENV) expression, known to be involved in immunological and neurological pathogenesis of human diseases. Our results have showed that the exposure to SARS-CoV-2 virus activates early HERV-W and K transcription but only HERV-W ENV protein expression, in an infection- and ACE2-independent way within peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures from one-third of healthy donors. Moreover, HERV-W ENV protein was significantly increased in serum and plasma of COVID-19 patients, correlating with its expression in CD3+ lymphocytes and with disease severity. Finally, HERV-W ENV was found expressed in post-mortem tissues of lungs, heart, brain olfactory bulb and nasal mucosa from acute COVID-19 patients in cell-types relevant for COVID-19-associated pathogenesis within affected organs, but different from those expressing of SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Altogether, the present study revealed that SARS-CoV-2 can induce HERV-W ENV expression in cells from individuals with symptomatic and severe COVID-19. Our data suggest that HERV-W ENV is likely to be involved in pathogenic features underlying symptoms of acute and post-acute COVID. It highlights the importance to further understand patients’ genetic susceptibility to HERV-W activation and the relevance of this pathogenic element as a prognostic marker and a therapeutic target in COVID-19 associated syndromes.
As most of you know, in the 80s researchers were excited about several (and separate) finds of retroviral activity in what we now call ME/CFS patients. The main researcher was Elaine DeFreitas, whose finds got dismissed by UK reserachers Behan and Gow as finding only "harmless" endogenous retrovirus.
DeFreitas insisted that they had been sloppy and didn't replicate her lab methods properly.
Either way, retroviral activity was undeniably present, and under certain circumstances endogenous retrovirus appears not to be harmless at all.
According to a quick wikipedia search:

Neurology, immunity, cancer: same cluster of stuff as where ME/CFS can be found. I was stricken by the presence of both multiple sclerosis (MS) and schizophrenia, as these are àlso associated with Epstein Barr virus (EBV), just as ME/CFS and Long COVID are.
If I hadn't coïncidentally been reminded of the 80s retroviral finds being dismissed as endogenous yesterday in Osler's web (because I was trying to find something else), I might have missed the connection.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.18.21266111v2
Last edited by a moderator: