The buspirone challenge test clearly distinguishes ME/CFS patients from healthy controls: why is it not being developed and deployed?

While I'm at it, I've had this somewhat-relevant paper open in a tab for a while:
Occupancy of Dopamine D3 and D2 Receptors by Buspirone: A [11C]-(+)-PHNO PET Study in Humans

They gave people a radioligand that binds to dopamine receptors, as well as various doses of buspirone. Then they measured how buspirone competed with the radioligand for dopamine receptors.

(DRD2 = dopamine receptor D2, DRD3 = dopamine receptor D3)
[..] findings suggest [buspirone] has high in vitro affinity for dopamine receptor D3.
No study has explored the occupancy of DRD3 by buspirone in humans. Here, we used positron emission tomography (PET) and the D3-preferring probe, [11C]-(+)-PHNO, to test the hypothesis that buspirone will occupy (i.e. decrease [11C]-(+)-PHNO binding) the DRD3 more readily than the DRD2. Eight healthy participants underwent [11C]-(+)-PHNO scans after single oral dose administration of placebo and 30, 60, and 120 mg of buspirone in a single-blind within-subjects design.

Two of their results might be of interest for us.
(1) Prolactin release correlated to dopamine receptor occupancy by buspirone:
[11C]-(+)-PHNO binding in DRD2- and DRD3-rich areas was decreased by the highest (60–120 mg), but not the lowest (30 mg), doses of buspirone. The maximal occupancy obtained was ~25% in both areas. Plasma levels of prolactin (a DRD2 marker) correlated with percentage occupancy after orally administered buspirone.

(2) in vitro buspirone is much more selective for D3 than D2 (which is interesting because prolactin release is controlled by D2 receptors). However, this study found that in vivo the D2 vs D3 selectivity of buspirone seems to be more equally balanced:
The in vitro data indicate a twofold affinity and an 11-fold functional selectivity [of buspirone] for DRD3 over 5HT1A, and 70-fold affinity over DRD2 (Kula et al, 1994), with metabolites of buspirone also binding with higher affinity to DRD3 relative to DRD2 (Bergman et al, 2013).
Our data indicate for the first time that acute doses of buspirone can occupy DRD2 and DRD3 in human subjects. This occupancy was in the same range for the DRD2 vs DRD3 and the maximum occupancy achieved during acute single-dose regimen was modest with the doses of buspirone tested.
 
Some other bits from reading

From the Wikipedia page for prolactin
Prolactin also acts in a cytokine-like manner and as an important regulator of the immune system. It has important cell cycle-related functions as a growth-, differentiating- and anti-apoptotic factor. As a growth factor, binding to cytokine-like receptors, it influences hematopoiesis and angiogenesis and is involved in the regulation of blood clotting through several pathways. The hormone acts in endocrine, autocrine, and paracrine manners through the prolactin receptor and numerous cytokine receptors.

Pituitary prolactin secretion is regulated by endocrine neurons in the hypothalamus. The most important of these are the neurosecretory tuberoinfundibulum (TIDA) neurons of the arcuate nucleus that secrete dopamine (a.k.a. prolactin inhibitory hormone) to act on the D2 receptorsof lactotrophs, causing inhibition of prolactin secretion. Thyrotropin-releasing hormone has a stimulatory effect on prolactin release, although prolactin is the only anterior pituitary hormone whose principal control is inhibitory.

increased serum concentrations of prolactin during pregnancy cause enlargement of the mammary glands and prepare for milk production, which normally starts when levels of progesterone fall by the end of pregnancy

In general, dopamine inhibits prolactin, but this process has feedback mechanisms.

Prolactin also stimulates proliferation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells. These cells differentiate into oligodendrocytes, the cells responsible for the formation of myelin coatings on axons in the central nervous system.
Prolactin follows diurnal and ovulatory cycles. Prolactin levels peak during REM sleep and in the early morning. Many mammals experience a seasonal cycle
During pregnancy, high circulating concentrations of estrogen and progesterone increase prolactin levels by 10- to 20-fold.
Levels can rise after exercise, high-protein meals, minor surgical procedures, following epileptic seizures or due to physical or emotional stress.

A lot to unpick and things may not be a clear single directional effect, but the relationship to dopamine and variation with sleep/wake and menstrual cycles aa well as changes in pregnancy given the reports we have on changes in me/cfs symptoms seems interesting.
 
And on the receptor

Prolactin receptors are present in the mammillary glands, ovaries, pituitary glands, heart, lung, thymus, spleen, liver, pancreas, kidney, adrenal gland, uterus, skeletal muscle, skin and areas of the central nervous system. When prolactin binds to the receptor, it causes it to dimerize with another prolactin receptor. This results in the activation of Janus kinase 2, a tyrosine kinase that initiates the JAK-STAT pathway. Activation also results in the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and Src kinase.

A bit more from the dedicated Wikipedia page
The PRLR is a class 1 cytokine receptor that uses messenger pathways to control cell proliferation, migration, intracellular ion concentration and inhibit programmed cell death (apoptosis). PRLRs also have functions in the second messenger cascades, including:
  • JAK-STAT pathway – the STAT protein family has been shown to have a key transduction role in cytokine receptor signalling; this pathway is initiated following the activation of PRLRs. Although there have been 4 STAT proteins identified as transducer molecules of PRLR, STAT5 is recognised as the most important transducer of PRLR isoforms, with a role in inhibiting the regulation of gene transcription.
 
It seems that elevated prolactin is unlikely to be our problem (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperprolactinaemia) but the way in which it and dopamine interact with effects on GABA in another of these finely balanced and regulated systems does seem enticing somehow.

If there were a problem somewhere with dopamine receptors or function of cells like the eMSNs/eSPNs you can see how this whole loop could easily spin out or be nudged in one direction or another.
 
Ah you guys are already talking about the dopamine connection!

When I ran LDN my prolactin went really high, during this time I found this paper with monkey prolactin on naltrexone:

 
Good to have this info here.

Another datapoint in support of hyperprolactinaemia not being our problem: if I recall correctly, several of these buspirone challenge studies also checked prolactin before the challenge and found it was the same between pwME and controls. But maybe having little spikes of prolactin all the time that are larger than usual has its own set of consequences.

I'm also very curious about the other direction -- if the (claimed) buspirone sensitivity says something about the D2 receptors that could in turn tell us about something happening upstream with dopamine.
 
Back
Top Bottom