United Kingdom: Science Media Centre (including Fiona Fox)

Discussion in 'News from organisations' started by Esther12, Dec 10, 2017.

  1. JemPD

    JemPD Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,500
    alktipping, MEMarge, Jan and 3 others like this.
  2. JemPD

    JemPD Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,500
    Haha YES! that is exactly what i was thinking of thank you :)
    I did search the forum but i obviously didnt use the right search terms. I never have much luck with that :confused:
     
    alktipping, janice, Jan and 3 others like this.
  3. Daisymay

    Daisymay Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    686
    They want us to feel f'cked, part of their ploy, but don't let them win!

    They're running scared, this fact sheet was a different tone from usual I think, full of mis-information and lies but the focus was more on covering their asses I think.

    Let's focus on the paper when it comes out not on this fake news.
     
    Samuel, alktipping, MEMarge and 8 others like this.
  4. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    14,837
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    as the U.K. BPS mafia are so close with the Dutch BPS mafia this must also be linked to the report from the Health Council in case U.K. journos are asking questions about U.K. implications.
     
    alktipping, MEMarge, James and 3 others like this.
  5. Simone

    Simone Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    452
    Location:
    Australia
    No, it’s an “alternative facts” sheet, the likes of which would give Kellyanne Conway a run for her money.
     
  6. Simone

    Simone Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    452
    Location:
    Australia
    I completely agree. PACE may be the GET/CBT’s jewel in the crown, but there is still a large body of similarly (though perhaps not as egregiously) flawed work left standing once PACE has gone. That’s why I wrote this PEM/GET primer, focussing on the flaws in the GET research as a whole, not just GET.
    https://emerge.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PEM-GET-Primer-December-2017.pdf
     
    alktipping, Woolie, MEMarge and 24 others like this.
  7. Forbin

    Forbin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,581
    Location:
    USA
    I'm having trouble figuring out their priorities...

    Untitled-4.jpg
     
    alktipping, MEMarge, Skylark and 33 others like this.
  8. RuthT

    RuthT Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    204
    Thank you. Helping to plan #MillionsMission in London with #STOP GET as main message. Can we use Executive Summary & cite reference to primer in a leaflet? Thanks.
     
    MEMarge, janice, Jan and 10 others like this.
  9. Simone

    Simone Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    452
    Location:
    Australia
    Yes! So long as you acknowledge me as author, go for it!
     
    janice, MEMarge, Jan and 9 others like this.
  10. Cheshire

    Cheshire Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,675
    SMC's Expert reaction to reanalysis of the PACE trial for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) treatments

    They've had trouble finding people supporting Sharpe and co.
    Jon Stone's comment is not really over enthusiastic.
    But still standing by his colleagues (and protecting his own business)
    Ponting's one is a clear step back, and supportive of the reanalysis findings. A very different speech from Holgate's.

    And as usual, the "authors' response", more disconnected and unsubstanciated than ever.

    http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/e...-for-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-cfs-treatments/

     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2018
    Woolie, MEMarge, Inara and 15 others like this.
  11. RuthT

    RuthT Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    204
    Thank you.

    Will absolutely reference you whenever we use & give link to full article.
     
    alktipping, MEMarge, janice and 10 others like this.
  12. Alvin

    Alvin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,309
    My response (if i had the ability) would be however in ME/CFS GET worsens patients physical condition and trying to brainwash them into believing they are not ill is not legitimate medicine nor considered ethical behaviour by most medical systems.
    Telling MS patients to believe they don't have MS would likely lead to an ethics board meeting in many countries much as it would if you told a cancer patient to pretend they don't have cancer and should by extension shun chemotherapy because they are not actually ill.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2018
    alktipping, MEMarge, Inara and 15 others like this.
  13. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,769
    MEMarge, Inara, Jan and 10 others like this.
  14. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    55,414
    Location:
    UK
    So we now have three SMC releases in 2 days.

    ''CFS/ME factsheet for journalists: The illness and the controversy''. here

    ''Reanalysis of the PACE trial'' here

    ''Expert reaction to reanalysis of the PACE trial for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) treatments'' here
     
    Inara, janice, Jan and 10 others like this.
  15. Cheshire

    Cheshire Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,675
  16. sea

    sea Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    476
    Location:
    NSW, Australia
    As awful as the fact sheet is, I detect a change in the way they’ve framed CBT and GET. Perhaps not quite so willing to blantantly display how they’ve been used in ME/CFS, and sounding much more reasonable in order to claim their critics are the unreasonable ones. The CBT and GET described in the fact sheet are not as they were described in PACE. It’s a considered ploy to note how these are used in other illnesses without saying how differently they are applying them in ME/CFS.
     
    alktipping, MEMarge, Inara and 17 others like this.
  17. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,769
  18. Alvin

    Alvin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,309
    They can reframe in public all they want, as far as we know they are still using the same lies and snake oil in treatments. They still abduct children from their families for forced "treatment", they still lock up adults against their will, they still fight to deny benefits to patients who are disabled. Until this changes its only lipstick on a pig. That what we need to remind the public.
     
    alktipping, Woolie, Inara and 16 others like this.
  19. sea

    sea Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    476
    Location:
    NSW, Australia
    Absolutely agree. I don’t believe they’ve changed their position at all, they’re just trying to make it sound more reasonable, and we need to make sure the public know exactly what we’re dealing with.
     
    alktipping, Woolie, MEMarge and 14 others like this.
  20. Cheshire

    Cheshire Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,675
    Well, that is a lie, because the type of CBT tested in the PACE trial has nothing to do with the CBT that helps people coping when suffering from other illnesses.

    From their protocol:
    We must fight against this normalisation of their CBT, try to prevent them from sweeping the false illness belief (which seems now very embarrassing) under the carpet, because that was their number one aim, and the major element of the therapy.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2018
    alktipping, Woolie, fossil and 30 others like this.

Share This Page