Upper Airway Resistance Syndrome (UARS): a common underlying cause for all "chronic complex illnesses"? (ME/CFS, fibro, GWI, etc.)

Sleep medicine doctors make ridiculous arguments like the below in defense of the sleep fragmentation paradigm of sleep-disordered breathing. I'm not going to engage with arguments making personal attacks on Dr. Gold when it comes to discussing UARS. Taking a break from this for now.
View attachment 27046
I will say, these statements about not needing any data because their conclusion is so obvious do appear ridiculous.

I can't seem to find the paper. I mean I can find it on Pubmed, but the link to the publisher page is missing.

It looks like that was a "Pro" side of a debate. I can find the "Con" side from Dr. Gold, as well as Dr. Gold's reply to the Pro side.

Edit: Nevermind, I found it: Link

Edit: Pasting section here in text form (line breaks and bolding added):
With the availability of polysomnography, the essential features of obstructive sleep apnea - mainly recurrent arousals and cyclical hypoxemia - became self-evident. Because of such advancements understanding the genesis of excessive sleepiness in sleep apnea does not necessarily require empirical evidence.

As has been the case with the absence of experimental data on the utility of parachutes in saving lives [5], excessive sleepiness due to recurrent arousals or awakenings is an obvious conclusion based purely on rational thought. The fact that sleep continuity is essential for its restorative effects is intuitively sufficient to claim that sleep fragmentation is, in part, the cause of excessive daytime sleepiness in sleep apnea.

Thus, if one were to take a rationalist approach [6], the link between sleep fragmentation and daytime sleepiness in sleep apnea can be deduced based on intuitive reasoning. Rationalists often also use the notion of innate knowledge, which is not based on a priori experience, as means to answer questions in the natural sciences [6].

Even if one were to imagine no a priori knowledge on the electroencephalographic characteristics of arousals or their presence in sleep apnea, there would be no question that it is innately known to most that good sleep quality is vital to normal daytime alertness. With such overtly clear and simple facts, there is no need for experimental or even observational data on whether sleep fragmentation from recurrent arousals in sleep apnea causes daytime sleepiness. The argument for causal effects can literally stop here without any further discussion.
 
Last edited:
@nataliezzz,
Sorry to sound dismissive, but there are reasons for everyone being sceptical here.

Most of us do not use social media - I don't even know what Blue Sky is - and many specifically prefer not to have anything to do with X. It is hard to find what the theory really is from your first post but it seems to be, in plain English, something like "all chronic unexplained illnesses like FM and MECFS are due to narrowing of the trachea, glottis or pharynx".
Hi Dr. Edwards,

I have gotten feedback from multiple people that sharing the Bluesky thread is not preferred/accessible (I thought it was a good way to go since I had laid everything out in great detail there with visuals/etc.). I am going to come back to this post soon and describe the theory in better detail with links to the literature here so it is accessible to people here. So maybe we can pick up this discussion again next week after I have had some time to do that. However, in the meantime:

The theory is not that "all chronic unexplained illnesses like FM & ME/CFS are due to narrowing of the trachea, glottis or pharynx." The theory is that these illnesses are due to a stress response/sensitization in the limbic system of the brain to inspiratory flow limitation during sleep which was triggered by HPA axis activation by a stressor (e.g. infection). It provides a possible explanation for how people can develop an identical syndrome (ME/CFS) after any viral or bacterial infection but also other diverse stressors like surgery, physical/psychological trauma, pregnancy/childbirth, chemical exposures, and on and on (like I said to someone else, I don't buy the notion that people who developed ME/CFS suddenly after a car crash or surgery simultaneously acquired an asymptomatic infection which was the actual trigger for their ME/CFS). It can also provide an explanation for many other observations about ME/CFS: significant fluctuations in symptoms even on a day-to-day/hour-to-hour basis, PEM being able to be triggered by things like emotional distress and sensory input alone, symptoms of PEM & severe ME/CFS being able to be rapidly and dramatically reduced by benzodiazepines, the hypermobility/EDS connection (which you seem skeptical is real? I thought there were actual studies demonstrating it but not sure).

Millions of people have inspiratory flow limitation (with or without OSA - apnea/hypopnea index [AHI] > 5) with no daytime fatigue/sleepiness. It is well recognized that the majority of people with OSA are asymptomatic. And yet, both OSA & snoring (= inspiratory flow limitation, though you can have inspiratory flow limitation without audible snoring) in the absence of OSA are shown by large population-level data (see links below) to be associated with daytime sleepiness (by the way almost everyone with OSA snores, so which is more associated with sleepiness: OSA or snoring?). And it has also been demonstrated that people with OSA syndrome (OSA + daytime fatigue/sleepiness) and UARS (AHI <5 with inspiratory flow limitation + daytime fatigue/sleepiness) have reduction in their daytime fatigue/sleepiness with CPAP treatment. The symptoms of UARS & OSAS are not caused by narrowing/collapse of the airway alone (otherwise everyone with OSA would be symptomatic); they are caused by narrowing/collapse of the airway + something else (& Dr. Gold's theory is that is a stress response in the brain to inspiratory flow limitation).

https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9804051
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199304293281704
https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1164/ajrccm.162.4.9911073

To make a start on testing that we would need some evidence that there was a striking difference between all people with these illnesses and everyone else, using a blinded study of a cohort that was not selected by attendance at clinics that might have biased samples. Is there any such evidence?
Science begins with an observation, and then you do those types of studies. As I said, Dr. Gold is primarily a clinician (not a researcher) which is part of the reason he figured this out. He had an observation: alpha-delta sleep (abnormal intrusion of alpha waves [associated with relaxed wakefulness] into delta wave/deep sleep) - an objective finding well recognized to be associated with fibromyalgia - in many of his UARS patients who did not have a diagnosis of fibromyalgia. He also noticed that many of his UARS patients complained of "functional somatic syndrome" symptoms. Dr. Gold's studies + the other studies from other authors in my thread + the fibromyalgia case reports from other authors (with one having the objective finding of alpha-delta sleep disappearing along with fibromyalgia symptoms when the patient's sleep-disordered breathing was treated) provide more than enough supporting data to call for a large study.

But here is a study (not from Dr. Gold) where a rheumatology clinic offered polysomnography to consecutive female (ACR criteria meeting) fibromyalgia patients who were not specifically complaining of sleep disturbances; 40% (23) agreed and all 23 had OSA, with 19/23 (83%) having an AHI >15. That does not happen by chance - the prevalence of OSA (AHI ≥ 5) in women in the general population based on epidemiological studies is ~15-20%.
Sleep-disordered breathing among women with fibromyalgia syndrome
Obstructive sleep apnea is a common disorder in the population—a review on the epidemiology of sleep apnea
1752591072455.png
Beyond that the theory seems to slip into the pseudoscientific language of psychology - things like 'dysfunctional stress response' - of the sort popular with the therapy professions who have been instrumental in pretending to treat ME/CFS while in reality making peoples' lives a misery. Language of this sort is too vague to be of any scientific use and anyway nobody should be suggesting treating people on the basis of a theory without adequate trials. In this respect Dr Gold appears to be exactly like Wessely and Chalder on the CBT side and equally the hypermobility physicians who have built up the story that somehow chronic fatigue is linked to 'hEDS', which then got linked to ME/CFS by the psychologists who think ME/CFS is chronic fatigue.
I don't think Dr. Gold is anything like Wessely and Chalder. Like I said, he was just a clinician who had an observation (alpha-delta sleep and "functional somatic syndrome" symptoms in many of his UARS patients) and pursued some small studies in Gulf War illness & fibromyalgia patients to investigate if sleep-disordered breathing could be causing the symptoms of fibro/GWI and then published his theory in Sleep Medicine Reviews so researchers in sleep medicine would hopefully call for larger-scale studies (they didn't).

At one level we can be certain that all ME/CFS symptoms are generated in the brain. But we need to understand the specific causal pathways that lead to that - which are likely to be both inside and outside the brain (airway obstruction isn't in the brain). I (and many researchers) think it is very likely that ME/CFS symptoms have nothing much to do with mitochondria or metabolism, but building a theory requires proposing specific alternative pathways. And you are never going to know the theory is right until you have tested it therapeutically with an adequately controlled study.
Glad we would both agree ME/CFS symptoms begin in the brain! Airway obstruction isn't in the brain, but a stress response to inspiratory flow limitation during sleep (which the evidence points to being the primary cause of fatigue/sleepiness in sleep-disordered breathing patients - I'll be going into this when I update my post) could be. We haven't actually visualized it with fMRI etc. but there is evidence that points to it.

There was a small controlled study. 18 GWI patients had 96%±5 of their breaths flow limited while 11 age/BMI-matched asymptomatic Gulf War vets had 36±25% of their breaths flow limited (p = <.0001). The GWI patients treated with CPAP experienced improvements in the symptoms of GWI (fatigue, pain, cognitive dysfunction, etc.) which were highly and significantly correlated with changes in an objective finding (decreased sleep stage shifts) in all patients (GWI patients on sham CPAP did not experience decreased sleep stage shifts & got slightly worse). This is the kind of study you call for a larger controlled trial based on! Also, Dr. Gold's fibromyalgia study did not have a control group, but one of the fibromyalgia patients who was unemployed due to symptoms and remained on CPAP returned to full employment.
1752596278833.png1752596370119.png
1752596410195.png
All the stuff I have seen from sleep medicine physicians since the 'specialty' became fashionable about twenty years ago has been deeply unimpressive. There is no excuse for tinkering about with treatments as 'a clinician' without doing proper trials. There is nothing worthy about that sort of behaviour.
"Tinkering about with treatments as 'a clinician' without doing proper trials." That is not what is happening here. Dr. Gold has a lot of fibromyalgia patients referred to his department because the rheumatology department at his university has caught on to the fibromyalgia - sleep-disordered breathing connection, and he finds that they all (or almost all) have sleep-disordered breathing, and that their fibromyalgia symptoms (pain, fatigue, insomnia, IBS, etc.) improve when treated with CPAP that is properly titrated to eliminate inspiratory flow limitation (I think this is a big part of the reason why many OSAS patients don't feel [much] better on CPAP by the way - their AHI may be down, but they can still have a lot of flow limitation).

CPAP is an almost no risk treatment and it is the established treatment for OSAS/UARS (sleep-disordered breathing + daytime fatigue/sleepiness), which he finds to be present in all/close to all the fibromyalgia patients he sees. This is exactly what a clinician does - treats people for a disorder they have. There is nothing questionable about this at all.
 
I am afraid that none of that dents (or runs contrary to ) my arguments as far as I can see @nataliezzz. I have worked alongside physicians like this all my life. They pass the 'difficult' patients around until somebody with a theory collects them and treats them without doing trials.

Still, if you have some more thoughts, let's hear them.
 
I am afraid that none of that dents (or runs contrary to ) my arguments as far as I can see @nataliezzz. I have worked alongside physicians like this all my life. They pass the 'difficult' patients around until somebody with a theory collects them and treats them without doing trials.

Still, if you have some more thoughts, let's hear them.
You asked for evidence that there was a difference between all people with these illnesses and the general population. I provided you with evidence that in a representative sample of female fibromyalgia patients (not specifically complaining of sleep disturbances) from a rheumatology clinic, all 23 who underwent polysomnography had OSA, while the prevalence of OSA in females in the general population based on large epidemiological studies is 15-20%. This is the kind of evidence that reasonable people would agree warrants calling for a large population-based study (doctors choosing to ignore this type of statistically significant evidence [and that of the GWI study] because of small sample sizes and failing to call for large studies is the reason why we don't have those large studies).

Sorry, but you are not engaging with the evidence here!
 
I provided you with evidence that in a representative sample of female fibromyalgia patients (not specifically complaining of sleep disturbances) from a rheumatology clinic, all 23 who underwent polysomnography had OSA
A tiny trial from one clinic is not evidence for the prevalence of anything. There is nothing to engage with here.
while the prevalence of OSA in females in the general population based on large epidemiological studies is 15-20%.
That is the opposite of evidence that OSA is the key to ME/CFS, FM, etc, because most of those people do not have those conditions.

Do you have any evidence that shows that something abnormal only happens in the people with those conditions, and never in the people without it? You need to find the critical differences between the groups.

If you don’t have that, you don’t have an explanation for the disease.
 
I provided you with evidence that in a representative sample of female fibromyalgia patients

Yes, but studies of clinic cohorts like that are almost certainly going to be hopelessly biased. I am afraid my view is that reasonable people would not want to spend a lot of time replicating this if they aware of just how baised this sort of process tends to be. Patients get referred across to sleep clinics because they have some suggestion of sleep problems. And I wouldn't trust a rheumatologist to be able to diagnose 'fibromyalgia' in a meaningful way. There was a study indicating rheumatologists differ by a factor of 100 in how often they make the diagnosis. For a rheumatologist to be able to identify patients with a 100% abnormality rate of anything smacks of black magic in that context.

There are times when it is good to make sure one's brain has not fallen out, as the saying goes!
 
A tiny trial from one clinic is not evidence for the prevalence of anything. There is nothing to engage with here.

That is the opposite of evidence that OSA is the key to ME/CFS, FM, etc, because most of those people do not have those conditions.

Do you have any evidence that shows that something abnormal only happens in the people with those conditions, and never in the people without it? You need to find the critical differences between the groups.

If you don’t have that, you don’t have an explanation for the disease.
I don't think you are really interested in engaging with the evidence either. It's clear you haven't considered the theory at all; the majority of people with OSA do not have fatigue/sleepiness either, and yet OSA causing fatigue/sleepiness (which can be alleviated by CPAP) is an established fact. Same for headaches. Saying the majority of people with OSA do not have headaches does not prove that OSA can't cause headaches - the same is true for fibromyalgia. Alpha-delta sleep is an objective finding well recognized to be associated with fibromyalgia; the case report I cited showed that with treatment of sleep-disordered breathing with a mandibular advancement device, alpha-delta sleep disappeared along with fibromyalgia symptoms (which are all subjective, by the way - we could argue that fibromyalgia doesn't exist because there's no objective evidence [aside from alpha-delta sleep?] of it, right? If we're adhering to your standards of evidence that is...). Do you deny that OSAS was the cause of that specific person's fibromyalgia? (her FIQR score decreased from 78.8 - indicating severe fibromyalgia - to 8.1 with treatment). Also, she went from having daily headaches to having headaches once every 2-3 months (but we're allowed to say OSA can cause headaches, just not fibromyalgia...)

Anyways, do you have any ideas about what is causing the sleepiness, fatigue and cognitive dysfunction in OSA syndrome patients?
 
Yes, but studies of clinic cohorts like that are almost certainly going to be hopelessly biased. I am afraid my view is that reasonable people would not want to spend a lot of time replicating this if they aware of just how baised this sort of process tends to be. Patients get referred across to sleep clinics because they have some suggestion of sleep problems.
I just specifically stated that the patients in this study were consecutive fibromyalgia patients in a rheumatology clinic, they were not "referred across to sleep clinics because they have some suggestion of sleep problems." (also, sleep disturbance is a core symptom of fibromyalgia, and unrefreshing/disturbed sleep is required in IOM ME/CFS criteria! It would be impossible to find a group of patients with these disorders without sleep disturbances). It honestly blows my mind that people are not more open to the possibility that ME/CFS is a sleep disorder considering how many of us actually wake up feeling significantly worse (with increased fatigue/pain, headaches, sore throats, etc.) than when we went to sleep - just ask us! If there are any other good theories on why sleep is actually "degenerative" for many ME/CFS patients, I'd love to hear them!
And I wouldn't trust a rheumatologist to be able to diagnose 'fibromyalgia' in a meaningful way. There was a study indicating rheumatologists differ by a factor of 100 in how often they make the diagnosis. For a rheumatologist to be able to identify patients with a 100% abnormality rate of anything smacks of black magic in that context.

There are times when it is good to make sure one's brain has not fallen out, as the saying goes!
Lol, you wouldn't trust a rheumatologist to diagnose fibromyalgia? How do you propose we diagnose it then? It's all just based on subjective symptoms...does it even exist? There are no consistent objective findings associated with fibromyalgia besides alpha-delta sleep (and perhaps SFN, I'm not sure how strong/replicated the evidence is for that though).
 
It honestly blows my mind that people are not more open to the possibility that ME/CFS is a sleep disorder considering how many of us actually wake up feeling significantly worse (increased fatigue/pain, headaches, sore throats, etc.) than when we went to sleep - just ask us!
Just pointing out that I don't think (all) people here are necessarily against the idea that sleep dysfunction might be a major component of ME/CFS. Discussion from a while ago: https://www.s4me.info/threads/what-...tive-exertion-can-cause-pem.42282/post-581865
 
I have to assume you understand what correlation is, and why it does not imply causation.
I'd be really, really interested to hear what you think the "correlational" factor unrelated to sleep-disordered breathing could be for 93/400 (23%) consecutive UARS patients at a large sleep medicine center (Stanford) - all of whom had an abnormally small oral cavity based on measurements taken by an ENT- having low BP, while 2/3,369 (.06%) consecutive OSAS patients had low BP. Really looking forward to your answer here!

https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1164/ajrccm.164.7.2011036
Here's the study (it is not by Dr. Gold, by the way)
It is not a personal attack on someone to say that what they’ve published hasn’t been of any interest. It’s the complete opposite of a personal attack - it’s an «attack» of their work.
Re: personal attack, I was more referring to the fact that Dr. Edwards called Dr. Gold's theory a "nonsense quack theory" and that Dr. Gold just "tacked together some fashionable words" while openly admitting that he did not even read any of the supporting evidence (!) and was basing his opinion of Dr. Gold entirely on his PubMed track record, when Dr. Gold is primarily a clinician (medical director of the Stony Brook University Sleep Disorders Center), not a researcher. Dr. Gold being a clinician is the reason he figured this out; he noticed an objective finding (alpha-delta sleep) which is well recognized to be associated with fibromyalgia in many of his UARS patients who did not have a fibromyalgia diagnosis, and he also noticed many of his UARS patients complaining of "functional somatic syndrome" symptoms like IBS and body pain (and that these symptoms improved with CPAP).

I don't find the argument that sleep medicine ignores Dr. Gold's theory (and research supporting it) to be a convincing argument that his theory has no merit. Sleep medicine has not provided an alternative theory for why the majority of OSA patients are asymptomatic and why AHI/arousal index is not well correlated with sleepiness in OSA patients (if there is a better theory, let's hear it!). Like I said, eminent sleep doctors like Naresh Punjabi have literally said the following in a debate with Dr. Gold: "there is no need for experimental or even observational data on whether sleep fragmentation from recurrent arousals in sleep apnea causes daytime sleepiness."
 
I don't think you are really interested in engaging with the evidence either.
What do you mean by «engaging»? I have pointed out what I perceive to be flaws in your or Gold’s reasoning and evidence. Is that not engaging with the evidence?
It's clear you haven't considered the theory at all;
I have considered the evidence you have presented. The story doesn’t matter if its built on air. We need a foundation and I have not seen anything to start building from so far.
the majority of people with OSA do not have fatigue/sleepiness either, and yet OSA causing fatigue/sleepiness (which can be alleviated by CPAP) is an established fact. Same for headaches. Saying the majority of people with OSA do not have headaches does not prove that OSA can't cause headaches - the same is true for fibromyalgia.
If most people with OSA don’t have fatigue or sleepiness, then OSA isn’t causing the fatigue and sleepiness in the people that have it. Something else must be present - and that something else is the key. It might work in conjunction with the OSA, but the OSA is not the causal factor.

You need to look for the lynchpin - the thing that must be there in order for the symptoms to be present. Not all of the things that sometimes are there and sometimes not. Those might sometimes give clues as to what the lynchpin is, but they can also be complete red herrings.

There are countless examples of established facts being wrong - you have to show the evidence.
Anyways, do you have any ideas about what is causing the sleepiness, fatigue and cognitive dysfunction in OSA syndrome patients?
Unfortunately, I don’t.
 
If most people with OSA don’t have fatigue or sleepiness, then OSA isn’t causing the fatigue and sleepiness in the people that have it. Something else must be present - and that something else is the key. It might work in conjunction with the OSA, but the OSA is not the causal factor.

You need to look for the lynchpin - the thing that must be there in order for the symptoms to be present. Not all of the things that sometimes are there and sometimes not. Those might sometimes give clues as to what the lynchpin is, but they can also be complete red herrings.
Yes, OSA alone does not cause fatigue/sleepiness (at least until you get into the severe range [AHI >45] but even then the contribution to sleepiness seems modest and perhaps only captured my multiple sleep latency testing and not self-report measures as many people with an AHI >45 report no daytime fatigue/sleepiness).

However, it is an established fact that people with OSA syndrome (OSA + fatigue/sleepiness) and UARS (AHI <5 + inspiratory flow limitation during sleep + daytime fatigue/sleepiness) have improvement in fatigue/sleepiness with treatment reducing/eliminating upper airway narrowing/collapse during sleep (CPAP, mandibular advancement device, surgery). So their sleepiness/fatigue is in some way directly related to pharyngeal narrowing during sleep, there just has to be an additional factor besides pharyngeal narrowing (and Dr. Gold is proposing that factor is the brain's sensitization/stress response to inspiratory flow limitation as a stressor - remove the stressor with CPAP/surgery/etc. and sleepiness/fatigue/headaches/etc. resolve). There may be other explanations for what the additional factor is, but so far no one has proposed one.
 
It honestly blows my mind that people are not more open to the possibility that ME/CFS is a sleep disorder

I am very open to the possibility that ME/CFS is a sleep disorder. Have a look at the thread on unrefreshing sleep and see my comments about the similarity of ME/CFS to narcolepsy. That is not my point. It very likely is a sleep disorder but I don't see any of the evidence you are quoting as helping us work out in what sense. I cannot see why it should having anything to do with breathing.

Lol, you wouldn't trust a rheumatologist to diagnose fibromyalgia? How do you propose we diagnose it then?

Very difficult to know. But rheumatologists don't trust rheumatologists either - they just pretend to. Throughout my career as an academic rheumatologist I never made the diagnosis because it appeared to me to be so vague that it wouldn't help clinical care. It may well be that the whole idea of 'diagnosing fibromyalgia' is unhelpful at this point.

Most rheumatologists use the diagnosis of fibromyalgia either to provide a cover for the real diagnosis of 'annoying person with nothing wrong' or to pamper their egos as 'holistic practitioners' and conductors of an orchestra of minion therapists. A small number 'specialise' in fibromyalgia because there is no shortage of patients prepared to pay large sums for bogus advice.

I am sure there is one or more uncommon condition with disabling widespread pain due to some process we so far have no idea of. When we do start getting some idea we will probably need some more specific names.

This is a field where 'research' is 95% garbage - either psychosomatic garbage or so-called biomedical garbage, or quite often a mixture of the two.
 
However, it is an established fact that people with OSA syndrome (OSA + fatigue/sleepiness) and UARS (AHI <5 + inspiratory flow limitation during sleep + daytime fatigue/sleepiness) have improvement in fatigue/sleepiness with treatment reducing/eliminating upper airway narrowing/collapse during sleep (CPAP, mandibular advancement device, surgery).

Is that from open label studies with subjective endpoints like the PACE trial?
 
I cannot see why it should having anything to do with breathing.
Yes, this is the problem. You cannot see it because you are not a practicing sleep medicine doctor who has treated hundreds of patients with these disorders and seen the symptoms of fibromyalgia improve with treatment of sleep-disordered breathing (Dr. Gold is). ME/CFS (& fibromyalgia, etc.) being related to sleep-disordered breathing does not sound logical, so most people simply write it off without meaningfully engaging with the evidence (although a doctor calling it a "nonsense quack theory" while openly admitting they hadn't even read the supporting evidence was pretty shocking, I'm not going to lie). I will try to update my post in detail here but I think it would be impossible to put all of the information I have in my Bluesky thread into the post, so I'd encourage you to at least give Bluesky a try (just click on the link and keep scrolling down). It's funny because I actually came hear expecting most people to ignore/reject it, but thought you might be open to it.
 
I'd be really, really interested to hear what you think the "correlational" factor unrelated to sleep-disordered breathing could be for 93/400 (23%) consecutive UARS patients at a large sleep medicine center (Stanford) - all of whom had an abnormally small oral cavity based on measurements taken by an ENT- having low BP, while 2/3,369 (.06%) consecutive OSAS patients had low BP. Really looking forward to your answer here!

https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1164/ajrccm.164.7.2011036
Here's the study (it is not by Dr. Gold, by the way)
What do you mean «correlational factor»? All that study shows is correlation, it is not designed to prove causation.
Re: personal attack, I was more referring to the fact that Dr. Edwards called Dr. Gold's theory a "nonsense quack theory" and that Dr. Gold just "tacked together some fashionable words"
Those are not personal attacks. They are harsh and rudimentary criticism of the theory.
I don't find the argument that sleep medicine ignores Dr. Gold's theory (and research supporting it) to be a convincing argument that his theory has no merit.
Neither do it. It isn’t an argument for or against anything.
Sleep medicine has not provided an alternative theory for why the majority of OSA patients are asymptomatic and why AHI/arousal index is not well correlated with sleepiness in OSA patients (if there is a better theory, let's hear it!).
I don’t know if it has or not. But that doesn’t influence the validity of any other theory.
Like I said, eminent sleep doctors like Naresh Punjabi have literally said the following in a debate with Dr. Gold: "there is no need for experimental or even observational data on whether sleep fragmentation from recurrent arousals in sleep apnea causes daytime sleepiness."
That isn’t a very good look, I agree.
However, it is an established fact that people with OSA syndrome (OSA + fatigue/sleepiness) and UARS (AHI <5 + inspiratory flow limitation during sleep + daytime fatigue/sleepiness) have improvement in fatigue/sleepiness with treatment reducing/eliminating upper airway narrowing/collapse during sleep (CPAP, mandibular advancement device, surgery).
Established where - I have lost track of the references.
So their sleepiness/fatigue is in some way directly related to pharyngeal narrowing during sleep, there just has to be an additional factor besides pharyngeal narrowing (and Dr. Gold is proposing that factor is the brain's sensitization/stress response to inspiratory flow limitation as a stressor - remove the stressor with CPAP/surgery/etc. and sleepiness/fatigue/headaches/etc. resolve). There may be other explanations for what the additional factor is, but so far no one has proposed one.
Is there any evidence for Gold’s theory with regards to this brain sensitisation/stress response? It sounds awfully similar to Wyller’s theories and those are completely unevidenced.

And more importantly, how is all of this connected to ME/CFS - the topic of this thread?
 
I think it would be impossible to put all of the information I have in my Bluesky thread into the post, so I'd encourage you to at least give Bluesky a try (just click on the link and keep scrolling down)
If you want members to read information you have posted elsewhere, it's best to post it here.. If it's long you can copy and paste it into a series of posts. I personally can't really take in information that is split into a series of short posts on Twitter or Bluesky. Turn it into an article, and I'll read it if I am interested.
 
And more importantly, how is all of this connected to ME/CFS - the topic of this thread?
The connection to ME/CFS specifically is speculative. There is actual evidence re: a connection to fibromyalgia and Gulf War illness that people can debate the strength of though. ~1/3 of people with ME/CFS meet criteria for fibromyalgia (and the reverse may be even higher); many people with GWI have PEM/meet criteria for ME/CFS, etc. No one has ever identified an organic pathology explaining any of these disorders that all highly overlap in the individuals meeting criteria for them. I do not believe ME/CFS behaves like a 100% organic disease (this does not mean it is psychological) - just take the way many ME/CFS patients report that CNS depressants/sedatives like benzodiazepines and dextromethorphan (yep, that even made it into the Bateman Horn clinical care guide!) can both prevent/reduce severity of PEM when taken ahead of exertion, as well as rapidly reducing symptoms of PEM (& ME/CFS in general). The fact that PEM can be triggered by emotional distress or sensory input alone (or in some severe patients, even things like the stress of having someone in the same room as them not even making noise/in sight); all of these things point towards CNS sensitization and a dysregulated CNS stress response being involved (in my personal opinion).
1752605361755.png
 
If you want members to read information you have posted elsewhere, it's best to post it here.. If it's long you can copy and paste it into a series of posts. I personally can't really take in information that is split into a series of short posts on Twitter or Bluesky. Turn it into an article, and I'll read it if I am interested.
Yes, sorry Trish, I am going to do that. I do think it would be difficult to accurately convey all the information in my thread here, but I will do my best.
 
Back
Top Bottom