Article: How having a disability became cool — The Telegraph

I had to look O'Sullivan up.
The forum have previously noted the work of this lady:

 
we have this one started in 2018
 
It’s the Telegraph, they have an agenda and have shown they will push it regardless of evidence. I see no reason to give them any credibility or clicks.
This is complete trash. Imagine being gullible enough to believe this.
They neither believe nor disbelieve it.

What they do believe is that it is useful for their self-righteous ideological crusade.

You can never be too cynical about people like this.
 
OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) report on: The rise in incapacity benefits after 2013-14 coincided with a rise in the state pension age.').

I mentioned this to someone I know who immediately told me that "Government statistics are all biased and fudged"

This is what happens when people in power are allowed to claim "alternative facts" and "fake news" when being held to account.
 
I mentioned this to someone I know who immediately told me that "Government statistics are all biased and fudged"

This is what happens when people in power are allowed to claim "alternative facts" and "fake news" when being held to account.
Yes. As Ben (who I mentioned earlier) and others have reported it also coincides with changes to benefits following austerity which meant people basically had to claim some form of incapacity to get enough money to live on. Combined with changes in how some statistics are reported there has been massive distortions and the ability for some to pick and choose a narrative they want.

From what I understand there does look to have been a real increase for some younger NEETs but that seems to be a problem elsewhere and perhaps also policy based (it’s now more expensive for an individual to stay in education, less vocational colleges and places are available following local cuts but it is also more expensive to employ young people).
 
O'Sullivan's book on mass hysteria, which I read recently, has a chapter on POTS. In it, she tells the patient who was hooked up to a monitor that her BP didn't drop when she stood up, therefore she doesn't have POTS and just thinks she does. It's clear that O'Sullivan knows nothing about POTS. The whole issue is that HR is rising in the absence of a drop in BP. If BP were dropping, then tachycardia would be an appropriate physiological response to maintain perfusion. The whole chapter was a muddle of her muddled thoughts and half-baked anecdotes about a patient who was convinced she had absence seizures, i.e. epilepsy. It is true that some people in our community have beliefs that they have diseases they don't have but this is not the norm. BPS people like O'Sullivan use cases like this to make us all look bad, though.
 
The real question is why it became cool to bash disabled people.
Good question.

Possible sub text in view of
The Telegraph article ('How disability became cool') states:

This 'one in four is now disabled' figure is frequently repeated in UK media articles calling for 'a crackdown' on disability benefits. BUT the one in four figure is NOT the number of people in the UK in receipt of sickness/disability benefits, and also includes the elderly population

The UK general public have taken the One in Four figure as 'evidence' that 'UK benefit claims are spiraling'. They are not 'spiraling'. I have given references that challenge the 'spiraling' myth in previous posts, which include the Financial Times, and the OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) report on:

The UK government's drive to reduce and deny sickness/disability benefits appears to position the UK as uniquely having a 'spiraling' disability benefits budget when compared with other countries. Though as a percentage of GDP the entire UK benefits bill has remained stable for 40 years, and is currently a lower percentage of UK GDP than when Cameron was PM (2010 - 2016).


The UNCRPD have been investigating the UK for the last 10 years for what it refers to as "grave and systemic violations of the rights of persons with disabilities".

One of the first things I looked up on the internet after a long absence a couple of weeks ago was the current status.

July 2025


It's why the Timms review is taking place.

I also discovered that the UNCRPD has now issued a similar report concerning the Mental Health Bill currently making it's way through Parliament.

May 2025

Mental health law and the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities

Authors:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London De Crespigny Park, London, UK
Legal Consultant; formerly Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
Durham University, Durham, UK


We argue that a form of mental health law, such as the Fusion Law proposal, is consistent with the principles of the CRPD. Such law is aimed at eliminating discrimination against persons with a mental illness. It covers all persons regardless of whether they have a ‘mental’ or a ‘physical’ illness, and only allows involuntary treatment when a person's decision-making capability (DMC) for a specific treatment decision is impaired — whatever the health setting or cause of the impairment — and where supported decision making has failed. In addition to impaired DMC, involuntary treatment would require an assessment that such treatment gives the person's values and perspective paramount importance.
My bold. Think liaison psychiatry in hospital settings. Overreach of the laws on informed consent when a patient with very severe ME is in hospital? Maeve Boothby O'Neill and others.

Also in May 2025

A report from the Joint Committee on human rights.


The UNCRPD is an international human rights treaty whose purpose is “to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity.” It was adopted by the UN in 2006 and has been ratified by 192 parties, including the UK in 2009.23 Unlike the ECHR, the UNCRPD has not been incorporated into domestic law. It does, however, bind the UK as a matter of international law.

Like all media outlets, The Telegraph knows this.

As regards the social media side of this article I can't comment as I don't have the cognitive bandwidth to be on it.
 
An article from a wheelchair user that has lived through the changes in public perceptions of disability in the UK in the last 50 years.
It’s shocking to me how much physical violence he had to endure, starting in the late 90‘s:
 
Back
Top Bottom