The real question is why it became cool to bash disabled people.
Good question.
Possible sub text in view of
The Telegraph article ('How disability became cool') states:
This 'one in four is now disabled' figure is frequently repeated in UK media articles calling for 'a crackdown' on disability benefits. BUT the one in four figure is NOT the number of people in the UK in receipt of sickness/disability benefits, and also includes the elderly population
The UK general public have taken the One in Four figure as 'evidence' that 'UK benefit claims are spiraling'. They are not 'spiraling'. I have given references that challenge the 'spiraling' myth in previous posts, which include the Financial Times, and the OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) report on:
The UK government's drive to reduce and deny sickness/disability benefits appears to position the UK as uniquely having a 'spiraling' disability benefits budget when compared with other countries. Though as a percentage of GDP the entire UK benefits bill has remained stable for 40 years, and is currently a lower percentage of UK GDP than when Cameron was PM (2010 - 2016).
The UNCRPD have been investigating the UK for the last 10 years for what it refers to as "grave and systemic violations of the rights of persons with disabilities".
One of the first things I looked up on the internet after a long absence a couple of weeks ago was the current status.
July 2025
A UN committee of disabled experts has told the government that its new benefit cuts bill appears to be a fresh attack on disabled people’s rights, a year after it issued a similar warning to the C…
www.disabilitynewsservice.com
It's why the Timms review is taking place.
I also discovered that the UNCRPD has now issued a similar report concerning the Mental Health Bill currently making it's way through Parliament.
May 2025
Mental health law and the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities
Authors:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London De Crespigny Park, London, UK
Legal Consultant; formerly Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
Durham University, Durham, UK
People with a mental illness may be subject to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), depending on definitions of terms such as ‘impairment’, ‘long-term’ and the capaciousness of the word ‘includes’ in the Convention's ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
We argue that a form of mental health law, such as the Fusion Law proposal, is consistent with the principles of the CRPD. Such law is aimed at eliminating discrimination against persons with a mental illness. It covers all persons regardless of whether they have a ‘mental’ or a ‘physical’ illness, and only allows involuntary treatment when a person's decision-making capability (DMC) for a specific treatment decision is impaired — whatever the health setting or cause of the impairment — and where supported decision making has failed. In addition to impaired DMC, involuntary treatment would require an assessment that such treatment gives the person's values and perspective paramount importance.
My bold. Think liaison psychiatry in hospital settings. Overreach of the laws on informed consent when a patient with very severe ME is in hospital? Maeve Boothby O'Neill and others.
Also in May 2025
A report from the Joint Committee on human rights.
The UNCRPD is an international human rights treaty whose purpose is “to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity.” It was adopted by the UN in 2006 and has been ratified by 192 parties, including the UK in 2009.23 Unlike the ECHR, the UNCRPD has not been incorporated into domestic law. It does, however, bind the UK as a matter of international law.
Like all media outlets, The Telegraph knows this.
As regards the social media side of this article I can't comment as I don't have the cognitive bandwidth to be on it.