Preprint Hypothesis: A Mechanical Basis: Brainstem Dysfunction as a Potential Etiology of ME/CFS and Long COVID, 2025, Jeff Wood, Kaufman et al.

Says this:
While I am going to see an EDS geneticist after my surgery, based on symptom descriptions, I’m pretty sure I don’t meet the diagnostic criteria for classical EDS or any of the other testable forms.

As for hypermobile EDS (hEDS), the one type without a known genetic marker, I also don’t meet the current diagnostic criteria.
 
As to conjuring up fancy mechanisms isn't a surgeon looking for custom, and dreaming up brain stem compression to sell, pretty much that?
It would be fancy if they sell it as *the* cause of ME/CFS as Jeff Wood does. But such pressure could put the brain immune system on the edge similar to what concussion does, and we already know concussion can cause debilitating fatigue. Again, it may not be worth looking into if it's only one case (or even two). But it may be if there are several independent cases.
 
Hello! In support of their argument, the authors of this preprint cite a 2018 paper by Dr. Peter Rowe and colleagues. Rowe et al. describe three patients who met the Canadian Consensus Criteria for ME/CFS and whose symptoms were alleviated by surgical management of spinal cervical stenosis.

I take Rowe et al.'s report seriously because:
-- Dr. Rowe has been treating ME/CFS patients for 30 years. He therefore understands PEM and is unlikely to have misdiagnosed three patients.
-- Dr. Rowe does not have a conflict of interest.

Granted, all three of these patients exhibited abnormalities on neurological exam and so were clearly unusual ME/CFS cases. Nevertheless, I think we should pay attention because these patients experienced PEM, the central symptom of ME/CFS. Understanding the diverse physiological pathways that can lead to PEM may help us unravel it.

For instance, I could imagine that most ME/CFS patients have a disease process something like:
autoimmunity -> autonomic dysfunction -> PEM
but the patients described in Rowe et al. had
pathological anatomy -> autonomic dysfunction -> PEM
 
Hi and welcome !
I take Rowe et al.'s report seriously because:
-- Dr. Rowe has been treating ME/CFS patients for 30 years. He therefore understands PEM and is unlikely to have misdiagnosed three patients.
In general, the purpose of this forum is to examine the evidence. I don’t think anyone should be expected to take anyone’s word for something.

Wrt Rowe, he has a history of making unfounded claims about hEDS, POTS, MCAS, treatments etc.
-- Dr. Rowe does not have a conflict of interest.
I disagree.

He has been providing treatments for these patients, and it would be damaging to his professional career to be wrong about something as serious as neck surgeries.

He also receives lots of extra patients because he has positioned himself as someone who can help patients for which no proven treatments exists.

It’s also not relevant to the validity of his arguments.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello! In support of their argument, the authors of this preprint cite a 2018 paper by Dr. Peter Rowe and colleagues.

Which I think simply demonstrates the muddled thinking involved. Cervical spondylosis compresses the cord, not the brainstem, so Rowe's cases do not support a brain stem theory.

There is no point in constructing medical theories if they do not add up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From the preprint, the evidence of recovery after surgery seems to be two case studies - Jeff Wood and Jen Brea.
Yes, and these two stories, one published on Wood's personal website and the other on Cort Johnson's HealthRising blog are described as "perhaps the most compelling evidence that at least a subset of ME/CFS cases are directly caused by brainstem deformation." That's concerning.

But, a lot more people with ME/CFS than these two have undergone neck surgery in the hope of improvement.
I haven't read the article, but if that's all they can come up with as recovery evidence 6 years on from Jen and Jeff doing their big social media push and setting up private facebook groups to promote the surgery, and Jeff running his business promoting it, then all this article is is advertising based on nothing.
@Trish, I am in complete agreement. I remember when this all began, s4me members called for data to be published by the surgeons so that it could be seen what kinds of diagnoses these patients had and what the outcomes of the surgeries were, and proponents of the 'mechanical basis' theory also indicated that data would be forthcoming. If, 6 years later, they are no farther along in that pursuit, we have gone nowhere with this theory. I wish it could be put to rest.
 
Any prospective New Patient should contact Mr. Jeffrey Wood
(Director of Data Collection and Screening).

Email: jeffrey.wood@mountsinai.org

As a first step, Mr. Wood will collect demographic, insurance, and clinical information.

OK, trying to sort this out.

Jeff’s affiliation on the paper is Renegade Research, which is a nonprofit. His email on the paper is jeff@mech*nicalbasis.org. He is listed on the Chiari EDS Center website, which doesn’t look like a nonprofit, with an email for the Mount Sinai hospital system, which is a nonprofit. Hmmm.
 
I've had a vestibular virus for the last 5 years that is exacerbated by exertion, my symptoms worsen due to physical and mental activity. I need to REST and pace to feel better. I've had ME/PEM for over 30yrs to know that it's not PEM, but I'm certain Jeff would consult me that I do.

He was all over Twitter years ago telling people they 'definitely had PEM". He deleted all this posts when he got flack for it.
 
Back
Top Bottom