chillier
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I agree! CA10 is also expressed in the brain of courseYes, but we have various pointers to DRG - the old autopsy studies, the fact that they are the portal for most sensory entry and the expression of CA10 there, especially in muscle nociceptors.
I believe there are different mechanisms that can increase and decrease synapse connections over time in an activity dependent manner and they probably operate over different time scales. In this example of learning a skill it might rely more on long term potentiation perhaps.The other thing to think about here is if we know that repetition actually builds and strengthens synaptic connections for things like manual skills, why this doesn’t seem to be the trick in ME/CFS. A family friend had a stroke and lost the ability to play tennis. Over time, and especially with repetition/practice, he regained his serve. In order for this to be a driving mechanism of ME/CFS, you need some way to explain why repeatedly doing a task doesnt make things easier in ME/CFS in a way that it clearly does when someone regains a skill after a stroke.
It only works as a chronic disease mechanism if initial synaptic loss drives further synaptic loss somehow, but we do have examples where that doesn’t seem to happen. So it can’t be synaptic loss alone, it would have to be synaptic loss plus some other enduring abnormality.
Yeah that could be right, and I'm thinking that other enduring abnormality could be could be related to synaptic scaling, another mechanism for changing the sensitivity of neurons to maintain homeostatic firing rates in the long run.
A large synapse loss event might be enough to (in a probabilistic way with risk increased perhaps by genetic background and if sleep related brain areas are affected) precipitate out a disease state where neurons become sensitised due to loss of input, enabling them to cause more synapse loss in an activity dependent fashion.