Kitty
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I didn't get that from this article, could you highlight the parts were you think this is the case?
'DecodeMe' is used in the subheading. I don't think it's really represented in the article, though.
I didn't get that from this article, could you highlight the parts were you think this is the case?
Ah thanks, I skipped over that obviously. My guess would be that is an error, as they correctly use capitals later on'DecodeMe' is used in the subheading. I don't think it's really represented in the article, though.
British scientists have announced that they are launching the world’s largest research project to unlock the genetic clues to this condition. The DecodeME project will collect DNA samples from 20,000 sufferers, after receiving £3.2m funding from the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research.
Ah thanks, I skipped over that obviously. My guess would be that is an error, as they correctly use capitals later on
Nice to see that in a mainstream news article.
I agree on that, and the article uses ME almost throughout which makes it all the more annoying that the main heading is 'chronic fatigue syndrome sufferers'.'DecodeMe' is used in the subheading. I don't think it's really represented in the article, though.
I just shared this to friends on FB with the comment:"Chronic fatigue syndrome sufferers hope for breakthrough as they fight for recognition", https://inews.co.uk/news/long-reads/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-cfs-decodeme-genetic-research-456045
Just checked it and it is now DecodeME.'DecodeMe' is used in the subheading.
Just downloaded this week's New Scientist (thank you to my local library) and it seems really odd that so far I can see no mention of this in the news section. Or on the website. They are normally all over genetic projects.
However from what I can see, they’re not linking it to ME or even other types of post viral fatigue, rather it’s written as if it’s only specific to coronavirus.
It's incredible to see all this coverage. My head is spinning.that is really weird. But they have this article which is currently #2 on their website:
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...ing-coronavirus-symptoms-can-last-for-months/
“Why strange and debilitating coronavirus symptoms can last for months
From extreme fatigue to weight loss, numbness, breathing difficulties and chest pain, some people’s covid-19 symptoms are proving very hard to shake“
However from what I can see, they’re not linking it to ME or even other types of post viral fatigue, rather it’s written as if it’s only specific to coronavirus.
I can’t access the whole article, if anyone can I’d like to know what it says afterwards. But it would be very odd if they didn’t mention ME at all in the whole article.
This is so important. One of the initial tropes from Wessely was that this must have only happened from a severe illness, the kind that borderline leaves you wondering if it would kill you. Hence the trauma nonsense. It's all about something that probably floored the patient initially, leaving them in a state of shock about whether it was normal to resume daily activities.It doesn’t even seem to be linked to how severely they had the disease, as far as I can see,” says Danny Altmann, an immunologist at Imperial College London.
What a week it's been, with the amazing launch of @DecodeMEstudy, the M.E./CFS DNA study that aims to help us understand the disease and ultimately find treatments.
It's been brilliant being able to share so much positive coverage, and see the overwhelming support from the M.E. community. Registrations from people with M.E. who want to take part have now topped 14,000 since Tuesday!
https://www.facebook.com/actionforme/posts/10158458029628209
Is it done on a weekly basis possibly would be covered in next edition?Just downloaded this week's New Scientist (thank you to my local library) and it seems really odd that so far I can see no mention of this in the news section. Or on the website. They are normally all over genetic projects.
Considering that the project hasn't had its formal launch yet - just its funding announcement - I think it's doing incredibly well.I also read that in order to achieve the 20,000 suitable participants they need, they are hoping for around 40,000 applicants to choose from.
Me too, very much so.Considering that the project hasn't had its formal launch yet - just its funding announcement - I think it's doing incredibly well.
I feel confident about that 40,000!![]()