livinglighter
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I have read that brief debate. It is basically just a short speech from MP, Andrew Bridgen, who was thrown out of his political party for spreading misinformation about the pandemic and vaccines. He spouts a lot of nonsense he has presumably believed from conspiracy websites, and is disagreed with by a government minister. End of debate. I doubt there were much more than the 3 people who spoke present.
We can by all means discuss real data, but there's no point giving a voice to people who have fallen down the conspiracy rabbit hole. Why would we want to contaminate discussion of real data about the relatively rare instances of people suffering severe symptoms after their vaccinations with this nonsense?
Edit: To clarify, this is my personal view, not a moderation team ruling.
I do not want to comment on anyone's sanity but there is mention about financial ties to Bill Gates which IMO sounds like a conspiracy theory..... I didn't see that.
The vaccine fund discussion is of interest though because I have heard some people attribute ME-like illnesses as a result of taking a vaccine. So perhaps this is what people also mean when they say vaccine triggered Long Covid.
EDIT: I'm removing the link from my post.
Last edited: