I think I remember reading a UK study that characterized patients by NICE, Oxford, and Fukuda and gave the prevalence of each. Does anyone remember that study and if so, could you share the study name or link?
Thanks in advance
Some revelations about shenanigans at NICE
- the IAPT team is in charge of the NICE guidelines for ME/CFS - as flagged up by Hope 4 Fibro & ME Northern Ireland - back in 2017!!!
According to the IAPT webpage it's still listing the "CFS/ME" guideline as under their control - that's the...
Open access at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/capr.12141
Posting this as it has been highlighted in the comments of Spoonseeker's latest blog that the concept expressed in this review is to be used to 'lower the bar' that NICE uses to assess treatments by, and therefore "to...
This is a letter we sent from S4ME to NICE as discussed in a voting thread for those members who have posted enough to have voting rights.
Sorry I forgot to post it here earlier
http://www.niceconference.org.uk/about
"challenging views", is that code for "completely wrong views"? Or perhaps "views that he has no actual proof for"?
Anyway, full agenda here, http://www.niceconference.org.uk/agenda
Moderator note: This post and subsequent discussion have been moved from this thread:
Forward ME Group CBT/GET Survey - Tell NICE your experiences
I have just telephoned Healthwatch who may be interested to help generally...... More on this later;
Policy and Public Affairs
Jacob Lant - Head...
Moderator note: post moved from Open - Forward ME Group CBT/GET Survey - Tell NICE your experiences
In my latest missive to NICE about LocalME Complaint, I was told that you can't make a complaint against NICE's processes!
Perhaps I should copy in the chair PB......and vice chair.
I wrote in...
#MEAction article with Forward ME Group statement here
Take the Survey
The survey closes on 31st January 2019.
We are counting on the ME community to spread this across all of their networks, both online and in-person.
Tag me if any technical problems with survey and I'll make sure they...
This thread is intended for collecting evidence of harms from GET and other therapies that involve increasing activity and/or exercise.
Particularly useful would be any research demonstrating either that GET has directly caused harm, or that research on GET that claims no harm has not properly...
I think it would be useful for all of us, and perhaps for the NICE committee members, to gather together resources about severe and very severe ME. This could include research and patients stories that illustrate good and bad practice in care for the very severely affected.
You may wonder what that picture’s doing here and what that title ‘The Vale of Strange’ is about. It should all become clear as this post progresses. But I think you will agree that ‘The Vale of Strange’ sounds like a fair description of where we find ourselves when we’re trying to argue the...
NICE documentation
NICE guidelines 2007:
Link to document
2007 NICE guidelines setup:
General comments from stakeholders (CFS/ME consultation draft 29 September – 24 November 2006)
Link to document
2018-2020 NICE guidelines revision:
Final scope
Link to document
Consultation on draft scope...
Didn't know where to post this or if it has been posted before;
https://www.qmul.ac.uk/wolfson/media/wolfson/ref-2014-results/UoA2-chronic_fatigue_syndrome.pdf
We have so much to thank QMUL for
This is a letter we sent from S4ME to NICE as discussed in a voting thread for those members who have posted enough to have voting rights.
We are posting here so that it and the responses are available publicly.
To: Dr Peter Barry
Chair, NICE ME/CFS Guideline committee
cc...
Been reading through some documents from the previous NICE guideline procedure (Dolphin posted most of them in this thread). They give some insight into the normal course of events and what we could expect to happen next at NICE.
I think at the first stage the Guideline Development Group (GDG...
Some thoughts about NICE
In fact, a robust debate about ME/CFS treatments rooted in scientific principles would be welcome, since such a debate has been largely absent in the UK. But it would require the NICE committee to include, in addition to a group of apparent GET/CBT proponents, a...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.